Abstract
Governments, civil society groups, and international organisations actively raise awareness about major environmental risks and work to mitigate them. In practice, however, sustainable development tends to be approached in stages: first by addressing the economic dimension, followed by the environmental, and finally, the social dimension. We argue that this sequencing reflects an inherent bias in how the importance of each dimension is perceived, with the social dimension consistently being undervalued. We challenge the prevailing notion that the social dimension is synonymous with poverty and is detrimental to natural resources. Instead, we propose that sustainable development must shift towards a model of socially sustainable development. Our findings suggest that socially sustainable development is more closely aligned with addressing inequity and enhancing capabilities, rather than merely alleviating poverty. It is therefore essential to move beyond the outdated view that economics and environmental protection are in conflict. Instead, we must frame the environment as a matter of human justice, where the social dimension is given its rightful importance. In this context, we present three key pillars of analysis-equity, safety, and social cohesion-to renew the sustainability debate and mitigate the disruptions caused by imbalances between the dimensions.