Abstract
Do females modify their reproductive investment if they do not succeed in pairing with a male that matches their preference? In a two-year experiment, we asked female blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) to select among six males, and then successively paired them with their preferred and their most avoided male. We monitored female reproductive investment through nest building activity, timing of breeding, size and number of eggs, number of fertilized eggs, and brood sex ratio. We found that females preferred males with a chromatic coloration (blue UV chroma of the head crown) that matched their own, but also that they preferred males with a lower achromatic coloration (less bright color of the cheeks and head crown). Although females paired with their preferred males tended to build heavier nests during the breeding season, we found no evidence of an effect of the pairing treatment on timing of breeding, or any other aspects of female reproductive investment. We however found that laying dates, clutch sizes, egg sizes, and brood sex ratio were significantly repeatable within females between the two years, despite the opposite pairing treatments. These findings show that in female blue tits, the males with which they are paired do not substantially alter their reproductive decisions.