Résumé
TROLL 4.0 is an individual-based forest dynamics model that is capable of jointly simulating forest structure, diversity, and ecosystem functioning, including the ecosystem water balance and productivity, leaf area dynamics, and the tree community functional and taxonomic composition. It represents ecosystem flux processes in a manner similar to dynamic global vegetation models, while adopting a representation of plant community structure and diversity at a resolution consistent with that used by field ecologists. Specifically, trees are modelled as three-dimensional individuals with a metric-scale spatial representation, providing a detailed description of ecological processes such as competition for resources and tree demography. Carbon assimilation and plant water loss are explicitly represented at tree level using coupled photosynthesis and stomatal conductance models, depending on the micro-environmental conditions experienced by trees. Soil water uptake by trees is also modelled. Physiological and demographic processes are parameterized using plant functional traits measured in the field. Here we provide a detailed description and discussion of the implementation of TROLL 4.0. An evaluation of the model at two tropical forest sites is provided in a companion paper (Schmitt et al., 2025). TROLL 4.0's representation of processes reflects the state of the art, and we discuss possible developments to improve its predictive capability and its capacity to address challenges in forest monitoring, forest dynamics, and carbon cycle research.
LAI(v)
LAI sat with LAI sat a threshold LAI and LAI(v) the LAI above voxel v. At height v above ground, we calculate temperature and VPD as follows: * Although fitted empirically to leaf exchange experimental data (Lin et al., 2015), attempts have been made to relate g 1 to functional traits and/or climatological variables (wood density, Lin et al., 2015; leaf δ 13 C, Franks et al., 2018) based on the premise that water use efficiency should be associated with functional strategies. See also values reported in Domingues et al. (2014).