Abstract
Background: The effect of intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) vs continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on mortality and/or renal function recovery in adults with acute kidney injury (AKI) and a recognised indication for renal replacement therapy (RRT) remains controversial.Objective: To summarise the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the ICRAKI trial.Design, settings and participantsICRAKI is a non-inferiority multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing IHD and CRRT. We will include 1000 patients with AKI receiving (or who have received) invasive mechanical ventilation and/or catecholamine infusion and who have at least one recognised criterion for initiating RRT.Intervention: The study compares IHD with CRRT.Main outcomes measures: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who will meet one or more criteria for a major adverse kidney event (composite of death, RRT dependence and/or more than a 25 % increase in serum creatinine from baseline value) 90 days after randomisation. Secondary endpoints are time to death; mortality at day (D)28, D60 and D90; number of patients with RRT dependency at D28, D60 and D90; number of patients with more than a 25 % increase in serum creatinine from baseline value at D28, D60 and D90; intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay; time until cessation of RRT; catecholamine-free days, ventilator-free days and RRT-free days through day 28; estimated glomerular filtration rate at hospital discharge; the number of episodes of adverse events.Conclusion: The ICRAKI trial will inform the choice of RRT modalities in critically ill patients with severe AKI. More than 300 patients were already included.