Résumé
How could we know if agricultural development interventions make contributions to sustainable development goals (SDGs)? Genetically engineered (GE) crops are celebrated as a class of technological interventions that can realize multiple SDGs. But recent studies have revealed the gap between GE crop program goals and the approaches used to assess their impacts. Using four comprehensive reviews of GE crop socio-economic impacts, we identify common shortcomings across three themes: (a) scope, (b) approaches and (c) heterogeneity. We find that the evaluation sciences literature offers alternative assessment approaches that can enable evaluators to better assess impacts, and inform learning and decision-making. We recommend the use of methods that enable evaluations to look beyond the agronomic and productive effects of individual traits to understand wider socio-economic effects.
•Agricultural projects are justified for their potential contributions to SDGs.•Genetically engineered (GE) crop development in Africa is one such set of projects.•Current GE crop assessments are insufficient to gauge their contribution to SDGs.•We engage the evaluation science literature to find enhanced approaches and methods.•Driving social impact requires centering intervention goals above technical outcomes.