Abstract
Objective: to provide national guidelines for the management of women with severe preeclampsia. Design: a consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict of interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. Methods: the last SFAR and CNGOF guidelines on the management of women with severe preeclampsia was published in 2009. The literature is now sufficient for an update. The aim of this expert panel guidelines is to evaluate the impact of different aspects of the management of women with severe preeclampsia on maternal and neonatal morbidities separately. The experts studied questions within 7 domains. Each question was formulated according to the PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) model and the evidence profiles were produced. An extensive literature review and recommendations were carried out and analyzed according to the GRADE® methodology. Results: the SFAR/CNGOF experts panel provided 25 recommendations: 8 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±), 9 have a moderate level of evidence (GRADE 2±), and for 7 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert opinions. No recommendation was provided for 3 questions. After one scoring round, strong agreement was reached between the experts for all the recommendations. Conclusions: there was strong agreement among experts who made 25 recommendations to improve practices for the management of women with severe preeclampsia.