Logo image
Radiotherapy with twice weekly Gemcitabine and Cisplatin compared to Cisplatin alone for organ preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results of the GETUG V04 randomized phase II trial
Article de revue scientifique   Open Access   Avec comité de lecture

Radiotherapy with twice weekly Gemcitabine and Cisplatin compared to Cisplatin alone for organ preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results of the GETUG V04 randomized phase II trial

Morgan Michalet, Philippe Ronchin, Thomas Reynaud, Nicolas Demogeot, Sophie Gourgou, Simon Thezenas, Jean-Michel Hannoun-Lévi, Naji Salem, Magali Quivrin, Olivier Riou, …
Radiotherapy & Oncology, Vol.217
04/2026
PMID: 41690405

Résumé

Trimodal therapy (TMT) Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) Humans Urinary Bladder Neoplasms Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Organ Sparing Treatments Chemoradiotherapy Cisplatin Gemcitabine Deoxycytidine Male Female Aged Middle Aged Neoplasm Invasiveness
Introduction:Trimodal therapy (TMT) is a viable option for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), but the optimal chemotherapy regimen remains unclear. This phase II randomized trial (NCT01495676) compared cisplatin (CDDP) with twice-weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and radiation therapy (RT) with CDDP plus RT.Methods:Patients with pT2-pT3N0M0 MIBC, after macroscopically complete transurethral resection (TURBT), received RT (63 Gy to the bladder, 45 Gy to the pelvis, 1,8 Gy/ fraction) with chemotherapy (CDDP 20 mg/m2/day for 4 days every 21 days alone or plus GEM 25 mg/m2 twice weekly). The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicities. A 1:2 randomization was planned to include 36 patients in the control arm and 73 patients in the experimental arm.Results:Sixty-nine patients were included: 24 in the RT/CDDP arm and 45 in the RT/CDDP/GEM arm. The median follow-up was 63 months. Two-year DFS was similar between groups (58.3% CI95% [36.6–77.9] vs. 60.0% CI95% [44.3–74.3]), with median DFS of 29.8 (RT/CDDP) vs. 37.4 (RT/CDDP/GEM) months. OS at 24 and 60 months was 91.3% [IC 95% 69.5–97.8] and 66.8% [IC 95% 39.6–83.9] (RT/CDDP) vs. 66.7% % [IC 95% 50.2 – 78.8] and 53.7% [IC 95% 37.2 – 67.6] (RT/CDDP/GEM). Toxicity profiles were comparable except for increased cytopenias in the GEM arm.Conclusions:Adding GEM to CDDP did not improve 2-year DFS in MIBC patients treated with TMT. Results should be interpreted cautiously due to early study termination and insufficient accrual.

Fichiers et liens (2)

url
Find in HALAfficher
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111443Afficher
Publié (version de la notice) Ouvrir

Indicateurs

1 Consultations de la notice

Détails

Logo image