Résumé
Abstract only e11607 Background: Although most early-stage breast tumors have a favourable outcome, some subgroups carry a higher recurrence risk. The objective of the EURISTIC Survey was to evaluate the perception French physicians have of the prognostic risk associated with the biopathological characteristics of tumors in pT1a,b N0 breast cancer. Methods: This 38 item postal survey was developed by an expert panel. 2,000 physicians involved in breast cancer treatment were contacted. Specialities involved were medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons, radiologists and pathologists. Results: The survey was conducted between September and December 2012. A total of 663 physicians responded (response rate = 33%). They stated treating an average of 50 breast cancer patients per month. 58% of physicians reported that tumour size was not considered a major parameter in this clinical setting. In the absence of an adjuvant treatment, the prognosis of T1a,bN0 carcinoma was perceived better if HR-positive rather than HER2-positive or triple-negative with a "positive" prognosis perception rated by 83%, 21% and 8% of physicians respectively. For pT1a,bN0 tumors, the criteria with the highest perceived prognostic risk were ranked as follows: HER2+ (29%), HR- (20%) elevated tumor grade (20%) and triple negative tumor (14%). The average size threshold for a "negative" prognostic rated tumor was 18 mm. This threshold was scaled up for HR-positive carcinoma (22 mm) and scaled down for HER2-positive (10mm) or triple negative carcinoma (7mm). Between 4 and 17 mm, there was a linear correlation between tumor size and perceived risk of recurrence with HER2-positive tumors always carrying a worse prognostic than HR-positive tumor (Table). Conclusions: French physicians have the perception that HER2-positivity and triple negative tumor biology strongly impact the prognosis of pT1a,b N0 carcinoma, independent of tumor size. [Table: see text]