Logo image
Post‐surgery level of circulating DNA in stage III colon cancer patients: Impact on the reliability of minimal residual disease detection
Article de revue scientifique   Open Access   Avec comité de lecture

Post‐surgery level of circulating DNA in stage III colon cancer patients: Impact on the reliability of minimal residual disease detection

Andrei Kudriavtsev, Saidi Daoud, Catalina Isabel Cofre Muñoz, Alexia Mirandola, Ekaterina Pisareva, Javier Gonzalo Ruiz, Marco Macagno, Nadia Saoudi Gonzalez, Evelyne Lopez-Crapez, Marc Ychou, …
International Journal of Cancer, Vol.158(10), p.2771-2783
11/02/2026
PMCID: PMC12996737
PMID: 41670381

Résumé

adjuvant therapy biomarkers circulating DNA colorectal cancer diagnostic Neutrophil extracellular traps minimal residual disease post‐surgery Humans Neoplasm, Residual Male Aged Middle Aged Circulating Tumor DNA Prognosis Biomarkers, Tumor Extracellular Traps Postoperative Period Reproducibility of Results Aged, 80 and over Neoplasm Staging Colonic Neoplasms Female
Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment using circulating nuclear DNA (cir‐nDNA) testing has demonstrated strong prognostic value in patients with operable stage III colon cancer (CC). However, further clinical research is needed to optimize the use of adjuvant therapy in this context. Since the sensitivity of variant allele frequency (VAF)‐based MRD detection depends on total cirDNA concentration, we investigated its variation in 67 stage III CC patients over 8 weeks following surgery. A majority of patients showed significantly higher post‐surgical cir‐nDNA levels compared to their pre‐surgical baseline—71.1% during the first month and 51.4% during the second. Cir‐nDNA levels tended to considerably vary (up to 18‐fold), especially during the first 3 weeks after surgery. We also observed a strong correlation between cir‐nDNA levels and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) markers throughout the 2‐month post‐operative period. While previous studies have generally assumed that cir‐nDNA levels decrease significantly within 1 month post‐surgery in MRD‐negative stage III patients, our findings challenge this paradigm. NETs appear to be a substantial source of cir‐nDNA and represent a major confounding factor in interpreting total cir‐nDNA, given the high inter‐individual variability in NETs production after surgery. Our data suggest that defining a single optimal time point for MRD testing may be misleading. Instead, we propose a sampling window between fourth and sixth week post‐surgery. Additionally, our results call into question the reliance on VAF as a standalone metric for MRD detection. The most robust strategy would involve integrated monitoring of total cir‐nDNA concentration, absolute mutant DNA levels, and NETs‐associated inflammation.

Fichiers et liens (2)

url
Find in HALAfficher
url
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70370Afficher
Publié (version de la notice) Ouvrir

Indicateurs

1 Consultations de la notice

Détails

Logo image