Résumé
Abstract Possession of flowers that trap fly pollinators is a conservative trait within the genus Ceropegia , in which pollination systems can be generalized or highly specialized. However, little is known about the role of plant–pollinator interactions in the maintenance of species boundaries. This study examined the degree of plant–pollinator specialization and identified the parameters responsible for specificity among four co-occurring Ceropegia species with overlapping flowering times. All investigated plant species were functionally specialized on pollination by Chloropidae and/or Milichiidae flies and each Ceropegia species was, in turn, ecologically highly specialized on only two pollinating fly morphospecies, though one plant species appeared more generalist. Species-specific fly attraction was due to the differences between plant species in floral scents, floral morphology, colour patterns, and presence of other functional structures, e.g., vibratile trichomes, which were shown to contribute to pollinator attraction in one study species. The combination of these olfactory and visual cues differentially influenced pollinator preferences and thus hindered heterospecific visitation. Furthermore, a pollinator exchange experiment also highlighted that species integrity is maintained through efficient ethological isolation (pollinator attraction). The mechanical isolation mediated by the fit between floral morphology and size and/or shape of fly pollinators appears less pronounced here, but whether or not the morphological match between male (pollinium) and female (guide rails) reproductive organs can impede hybridization remains to be investigated.