Logo image
Investigating the ADOS-2 calibrated severity score: insights from the ELENA cohort
Article de revue

Investigating the ADOS-2 calibrated severity score: insights from the ELENA cohort

Hugo Peyre et Amaria Baghdadli
Frontiers in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol.4, pp.1674226-1674226
2026
PMID: 41601706

Résumé

Psychometrics Cohort study Autism spectrum disorder Autism Confidence interval Resampling Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule Cohort Raw score
Introduction The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) is widely used to assess Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) symptom severity. To allow comparisons across modules and developmental levels, the Calibrated Severity Score (ADOS-CSS) was developed. However, concerns have been raised about potential changes in the measurement signal introduced by the calibration process, which may alter the signal captured by the ADOS-2 raw scores (ADOS-RS). Methods Using longitudinal data from the ELENA cohort ( N = 145 children with ASD assessed at baseline and after 3 years), we examined the psychometric properties of the ADOS-CSS and ADOS-RS. The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2) was used as an external reference. Bootstrap resampling was used to estimate means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Variance explained by module, age, and IQ was higher for the ADOS-RS (R 2 = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38–0.52) than for the ADOS-CSS (R 2 = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10–0.24). Stability of ASD severity scores over time was lower for the ADOS-CSS ( ρ = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.45) than for the ADOS-RS ( ρ = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.51–0.68). Correlations with SRS-2 scores were consistently lower for ADOS-CSS ( ρ = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06–0.22) than for ADOS-RS ( ρ = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.17–0.32). Similar patterns were observed for change scores (Δ indicating score differences between baseline and follow-up): ΔSRS-2 correlated more strongly with ΔADOS-RS ( ρ = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.09–0.28) than with ΔADOS-CSS ( ρ = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.06–0.21). Differences between ADOS modules were reflected in SRS-2 and ADOS-RS, but markedly attenuated in ADOS-CSS, suggesting that calibration reduces module-related variance but also induces changes in the measurement signal that may affect sensitivity to individual differences. Discussion While the ADOS-CSS facilitates standardized comparisons across modules, clinicians and researchers should be aware of potential distortions in the measurement signal associated with the calibration process. Clinical Trial Registration NCT02625116.

Fichiers et liens (2)

url
Find in HALAfficher
url
https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2025.1674226Afficher
Published (Version of record) Ouvrir

Indicateurs

1 Consultations de la notice

Détails

Logo image