Abstract
Actions for ecological restoration under the Great Green Wall (GGW) initiative in the northern Sahel have been plant focused, paying scant attention to plant–animal interactions that are essential to ecosystem functioning. Calls to accelerate implementation of the GGW make it timely to develop a more solid conceptual foundation for restoration actions. As a step towards this goal, we review what is known in this region about an important class of plant–animal interactions, those between plants and flower‐visiting insects. Essential for pollination, floral resources also support insects that play important roles in many other ecosystem processes. Extensive pastoralism is the principal subsistence mode in the region, and while recent analyses downplay the impact of livestock on vegetation dynamics compared to climatic factors, they focus primarily on rangeland productivity, neglecting biodiversity, which is critical for long‐term sustainability. We summarise current knowledge on insect–flower interactions, identify information gaps, and suggest research priorities. Most insect‐pollinated plants in the region have open‐access flowers exploitable by diverse insects, an advantageous strategy in environments with low productivity and seasonal and highly variable rainfall. Other plant species have diverse traits that constrain the range of visitors, and several distinct flower types are represented, some of which have been postulated to match classical “pollination syndromes”. As in most ecosystems, bees are among the most important pollinators. The bee fauna is dominated by ground‐nesting solitary bees, almost all of which are polylectic. Many non‐bee flower visitors also perform various ecosystem services such as decomposition and pest control. Many floral visitors occupy high trophic levels, and are indicators of continued functioning of the food webs on which they depend. The resilience of insect–flower networks in this region largely depends on trees, which flower year‐round and are less affected by drought than forbs. However, the limited number of abundant tree species presents a potential fragility. Flowering failure of a crucial “hub” species during exceptionally dry years could jeopardise populations of some flower‐visiting insects. Furthermore, across Sahelian drylands, browsers are increasingly predominant over grazers. Although better suited to changing climates, browsers exert more pressure on trees, potentially weakening insect–flower interaction networks. Understanding the separate and combined effects of climate change and land‐use change on biotic interactions will be key to building a solid foundation to facilitate effective restoration of Sahelian ecosystems.