Logo image
Evolution of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions in Dogs Treated for Meningoencephalomyelitis of Unknown Origin Between Initial Diagnosis and Relapse
Article de revue scientifique   Avec comité de lecture

Evolution of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions in Dogs Treated for Meningoencephalomyelitis of Unknown Origin Between Initial Diagnosis and Relapse

Carole Soulé, Laurent Blond, Robin Cavalerie, Stéphanie Piazza et Clément Baudin-Tréhiou
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Vol.39(3)
01/05/2025

Résumé

Necrotizing meningoencephalomyelitis Necrotizing encephalitis Meningoencephalitis of unknown etiology Granulomatous meningoencephalitis Follow‐up Control Canine MRI Necrotizing leukoencephalitis Animals Brain* / diagnostic imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / veterinary Male Meningoencephalitis* / diagnostic imaging Meningoencephalitis* / drug therapy Meningoencephalitis* / pathology Meningoencephalitis* / veterinary Recurrence Retrospective Studies Brain* / pathology Dog Diseases* / diagnostic imaging Dog Diseases* / drug therapy Dog Diseases* / pathology Dogs Female Immunosuppressive Agents / therapeutic use Longitudinal Studies
Background. The response of meningoencephalitis of unknown origin (MUO) in dogs to immunosuppressive treatment is unpredictable, and relapses frequently occur. Objectives Our aim was to describe the evolution of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions in dogs treated for MUO from diagnosis to relapse and to define the diagnostic and clinical value of repeat MRI at relapse. Animals Eighteen dogs treated for MUO that experienced relapse and underwent MRI both at disease onset and relapse. Methods. Retrospective, descriptive, longitudinal, case series study. Dogs were identified from medical records between 2015 and 2024. The MR images were reviewed by radiologists for lesion number, location, size, pre- and post-contrast signal aspect, meningeal enhancement, mass effect, perilesional edema, and evidence of intracranial hypertension. Results Median interval between MRIs was 259 days (range, 31–876 days). In dogs with relapse delay < 157 days, lesion number tended to decrease. Residual lesions tended to enlarge and exhibit contrast enhancement and perilesional edema (suggesting an active pathologic process), but without development of new lesions. After 233 days, all dogs had developed new lesions. Half exhibited enlarged active residual lesions, whereas the others showed either remission or smaller inactive lesions. Conclusions. Before a clinical relapse at approximately 6 months, remission of the initial pathologic process and development of new lesions appear unlikely. Beyond this period, new lesions may occur with or without remission of the initial pathologic process, and repeat MRI is of high diagnostic and clinical value in detecting new lesions and characterizing the underlying pathologic process.

Fichiers et liens (2)

url
Find in HALAfficher
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.70086Afficher
Publié (version de la notice) Ouvrir

Indicateurs

1 Consultations de la notice

Détails

Logo image