Abstract
A large body of theories on extra‐pair paternity (EPP) in birds has proposed four main “genetic” hypotheses to explain this behaviour: the “good genes” hypothesis, the genetic diversity hypothesis, the genetic compatibility hypothesis and the fertility insurance hypothesis. Empirical tests have been scarce, mainly because high sample sizes are difficult to collect. We have tested these hypotheses in three Mediterranean populations of blue tits Parus caeruleus in which 50–68% of the broods contained extra‐pair young. Results showed that the distribution of extra‐pair young among broods was not random, and that survival to fledging of extra‐pair young was higher than that of their within‐pair sibs. These results support the idea of genetic effects benefiting extra‐pair young. However, comparison of cuckolded and cuckolding males showed no significant difference in their body size, age, survival or relatedness with their paired females, and offspring morphometrics did not differ between extra‐pair and within‐pair young. We conclude that none of the genetic hypotheses can explain fully the high level of extra‐pair paternity, at least in our populations of Mediterranean blue tits. We suggest that direct ecological benefits of EPP for females should be tested more often in correlative as well as experimental approaches.