Abstract
Purpose: To compare the spectral performance of two different DSCT (DSCT-Pulse and DSCT-Force) on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at low energy levels.Methods: An image quality phantom was scanned on the two DSCTs at three dose levels: 11/6/1.8 mGy. Level 3 of an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm was used. Noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function were computed on VMIs from 40 to 70 keV to assess noise magnitude and noise texture (fav) and spatial resolution (f50). A detectability index (d’) was computed to assess the detection of one contrast-enhanced abdominal lesion as a function of the keV level used.Results: For all dose levels and all energy levels, noise magnitude was significantly higher (p < 0.05) with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force (12.6 ± 2.7 % at 1.8 mGy, 9.1 ± 2.9 % at 6 mGy and 4.0 ± 2.7 % at 11 mGy). For all energy levels, fav values were significantly higher (p < 0.05) with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force at 1.8 mGy (4.8 ± 3.9 %) and at 6 mGy (5.5 ± 2.5 %) but similar at 11 mGy (0.2 ± 3.6 %; p = 0.518). For all energy levels, f50 values were significantly higher with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force (12.7 ± 5.6 % at 1.8 mGy, 17.9 ± 4.5 % at 6 mGy and 13.1 ± 2.6 % at 11 mGy). For all keV, similar d’ values were found with both DSCT-Force and DSCT-Pulse at 11 mGy ( 1.0 ± 3.1 %; p = 0.084). For other dose levels, d’ values were significantly lower with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force (9.1 ± 3.2 % at 1.8 mGy and 6.3 ± 3.9 % at 6 mGy).Conclusion: Compared with the DSCT-Force, the DSCT-Pulse improved noise texture and spatial resolution, but noise magnitude was slightly higher and detectability slightly lower, particularly when the dose level was reduced.