Résumé
To assess the clinical relevance of switching to a second tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitor after discontinuation of a first TNF-alpha inhibitor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.OBJECTIVESTo assess the clinical relevance of switching to a second tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitor after discontinuation of a first TNF-alpha inhibitor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane database and Congress abstracts up to March 2009 retrieved all studies assessing the efficacy of switching to a second TNF-alpha inhibitor. Key words were rheumatoid arthritis AND failure OR switching AND TNF-alpha inhibitors OR adalimumab OR etanercept OR infliximab. Efficacy was evaluated by American College of Rheumatology (ACR), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria and drug survival. A meta-analysis of the percentage of responders was carried out. Statistical heterogeneity was tested by the Q-test.METHODSA systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane database and Congress abstracts up to March 2009 retrieved all studies assessing the efficacy of switching to a second TNF-alpha inhibitor. Key words were rheumatoid arthritis AND failure OR switching AND TNF-alpha inhibitors OR adalimumab OR etanercept OR infliximab. Efficacy was evaluated by American College of Rheumatology (ACR), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria and drug survival. A meta-analysis of the percentage of responders was carried out. Statistical heterogeneity was tested by the Q-test.In the 32 relevant studies (4,441 patients) selected, the pooled percentage of ACR 20 responders (12 studies; 1,570 patients) was 55.1% (95% confidence interval, CI 48.2-62) and that of EULAR responders (15 studies; 2,665 patients) was 74.9% (95% CI 72.3-77.5). In the 19 studies analysing the efficacy by the reason to switch, the pooled percentage of ACR20 responders was 54.3% (95% CI 45.8-62.5) for switch because of lack of efficacy and 62.5% (95% CI 57.3-67.6) because of adverse events. The percentage of EULAR response was similar in both groups.RESULTSIn the 32 relevant studies (4,441 patients) selected, the pooled percentage of ACR 20 responders (12 studies; 1,570 patients) was 55.1% (95% confidence interval, CI 48.2-62) and that of EULAR responders (15 studies; 2,665 patients) was 74.9% (95% CI 72.3-77.5). In the 19 studies analysing the efficacy by the reason to switch, the pooled percentage of ACR20 responders was 54.3% (95% CI 45.8-62.5) for switch because of lack of efficacy and 62.5% (95% CI 57.3-67.6) because of adverse events. The percentage of EULAR response was similar in both groups.This meta-analysis suggests that switching to a second TNF-alpha inhibitor is clinically relevant in RA. Response to a second TNF-alpha inhibitor appears to be slightly better if the first TNF-alpha inhibitor was discontinued because of adverse events.CONCLUSIONSThis meta-analysis suggests that switching to a second TNF-alpha inhibitor is clinically relevant in RA. Response to a second TNF-alpha inhibitor appears to be slightly better if the first TNF-alpha inhibitor was discontinued because of adverse events.