Abstract
Cetuximab is used in colorectal cancer (CRC), as targeted therapy against the Epithelial Growth Factor receptor (EGFR), in association with chemotherapy (5-FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan). Its binding inhibits signaling pathways downstream to the receptor leading to a decrease in proliferation and surviving. In KRAS mutated CRC patients, Cetuximab is ineffective, and half of KRAS Wild Type (WT) patients does not respond to Cetuximab either. Thus, a better knowledge of Cetuximab mechanism of action will help to improve response rate and to find new biomarkers of response. Recently, studies have shown that p53 protein is involved in the response to cetuximab. It would be interesting to know if the status of this protein could be a biomarker of response. Previously, we have shown that activation of the mitogen activated protein kinase p38 (p38MAPK) induces irinotecan resistance in vitro and in vivo and is a predictive factor of response to irinotecan. Moreover, others teams found that p38 MAPK also partially block 5-FU response and participate to oxaliplatin cytotoxicity. It seems that p38 is involved in mechanism of action of anti-tumor agent. The aim of our project is to determine, in KRAS WT colorectal cells, if p38 MAPK is involved as well in the cetuximab effect. In this aim, experiments were done on two KRAS WT CRC cell lines but with different p53 status which respond differently to Cetuximab: Caco2 cells (30% of survival inhibition, TP53 mutated) and DiFi cells (80% of survival inhibition, TP53 wild-type). Cytotoxic experiments combining cetuximab treatment and inhibition of p38MAPK or p53 by transcriptional inhibition or using a pharmacological inhibitor of p38 (SB202190) were performed. We assessed apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation by FACS analysis of cell cycle and DNA synthesis. In addition, BIM, PUMA and p27 expression were analyzed by QPCR and Western Blot. Our results showed that inhibition of p38MAPK enhances Cetuximab cytotoxic effect in Caco2 cells but impairs it in DiFi cells as inhibition of p53. We also observed that inhibition of p38 MAPK and p53 decreases cetuximab induced apoptosis and inhibition of p38 decrease anti-proliferative effect in DiFi cells. The prevention of cell death by SB202190 in cetuximab treated DiFi cells could be explained by ERK pathway activation and the decrease of FOXO3a nuclear localization leading to p27 and BIM expression decrease, respectively involved in cellular proliferation and mitochondrial apoptosis. Our results have shown the same inhibiting effect of SB202190 on the cytotoxic effect of two tyrosine-kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR (lapatinib and erlotinib) in DiFi cells indicating that p38MAPK implication is linked to inhibition of EGFR kinase activity not to Cetuximab only. We have shown that p38MAPK is involved in response to the inhibition of EGFR activity via nuclear localization of FOXO3a. p53 protein has also a role in cetuximab response. Both seem to be predictive factors of response to cetuximab therapy.