Logo image
Se connecter
Retour
Four Ways to Evaluate Arguments According to Agent Engagement
Acte de colloque   Open Access

Four Ways to Evaluate Arguments According to Agent Engagement

Pierre Bisquert, Madalina Croitoru et Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr
Brain Informatics and Health: 8th International Conference, BIH 2015, London, UK, August 30 - September 2, 2015. Proceedings, Vol.LNCS(9250), pp.445-456
8th International Conference on Brain Informatics and Health (BIH 2015) (London, United Kingdom, 30/08/2015–02/09/2015)
2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23344-4_43

Résumé

Cognitive Bias Argumentation Artificial Intelligence Dual Process modèle computationnel biais cognitif méthode de raisonnement outil d'aide à la décision processus cognitif intelligence artificielle
In this paper we are interested in the computational and formal analysis of the persuasive impact that an argument can have on a human. We present a preliminary account of the listener mental process (representation and reasoning mechanisms of the dual process cognitive model) as well as her engagement based on the ELM model. This engagement determines the reasoning process that the agent will adopt in order to evaluate and incorporate the uttered argument.

Fichiers et liens (1)

url
Find in HALAfficher

Indicateurs

1 Consultations de la notice

Détails

Logo image