Résumé
Unlike macroscopic objects, any system of nanometric size shows characteristics that strongly depend on its size and geometric form. Here we focus on the influence of confinement on properties of fluids, when the confining volumes are of nanometric size.Using Grand Canonical Monte Carlo simulations we show that when a fluid is confined in nano-volume, delimited by non-attracting pore walls, its density is heterogeneous close to the pore wall, and, on average over the whole pore volume, smaller than the density of bulk fluid. The heterogeneity of distribution of fluid density, resulting from the nano-confinement, progressively weakens when the pore size increases, and totally disappears inside the pores larger than 5 nm. On the other side, in the limit of very small pores, the fluid density approaches the ideal gas value. This effect should be distinguished from the well know heterogeneity of density of fluids adsorbed in nanopores, driven by the difference between the strength of fluid-fluid and fluid-pore wall interactions, that varies with the distance from the pore wall. Taking an example of hydrogen gas we have shown that the density distribution inside the non-attracting reservoir strongly depends on both: the distance from the pore walls, and the pore size and shape (Fig.1). Such a behavior, although non-intuitive in macroscopic sample, has a simple physical explanation. The energy of a given gas molecule strongly depends on the number of its nearest neighbors. In the nanopores this number decreases when the molecule is closer to the pore wall. Less intuitive is the observation that at higher pressures (p > 100 bar) the density of the gas close to the wall may be higher than in the middle of the pore, and even higher than the one of the bulk gas at the same thermodynamic conditions, despite weak H2-H2 interaction. Similar heterogeneity of gas distribution in non-attractive nanopores have been also observed for other gases (Ar, Kr, N2, CH4, CO2). However, because of the strong intermolecular interactions, these gases show slightly different density distribution close to the pore walls. The reported observations may affect some methodologies of evaluation of excess/total adsorption in nanopores, as these two quantities are calculated assuming the known – and homogeneous – bulk density of gas in the pore. We analyze this problem on an example of five gases: H2, CH4, the two intensively studied energy vectors, and N2, Ar, and Kr, commonly used for characterization of porous structures.